Haven't we all at some point typed an intimate question on Google search for user
responses. This mini research offers you
perspective and the assurance that you are not alone in it. It also gives you some validation for your
point of view.
Elizabeth Gilbert, in writing,
'Committed' was clearly going through a similar anxiety. Her last book, 'Eat
Pray And Love' had yet to become a best-seller, and the 38-year-old
was in a hopeless, new predicament. To marry or not to marry.
It is through this confusion that her
memoir was born. Not convinced about
marriage, and yet seeing no way out of it, Gilbert goes on a journey of
exploration into the institution of marriage. In her travels to places, she chats up people
from communities who lead lives and hold opinions very unlike her own. She
scans through books on marriage, goes through handy research on the topic, all
the while drawing parallels with her own life; an impulsive first marriage, a string of failed
relationships and now a dilemma about marrying again. What you get in the end is
a book that is both absorbing and insightful.
Gilbert's scepticism about marriage
is genuine and you can literally feel her grappling for answers and reassurance
through the 280 odd pages of this long book.
She is happy to be with her current
boyfriend, Filipe, a Brazilian-born man of Australian citizenship and even more
happier about their arrangement. Neither wants marriage, as both are happy
leading their separate lives in different continents, and meeting each other
every month. Both have been scarred by earlier divorces. Gilbert is
particularly worried about being financially vulnerable if she opts for
marriage. As a single woman who makes her own money, she is extra cautious this
time. Most importantly, Gilbert is unsure about herself, given her predilection
for disastrous romantic entanglements.
She loves the companionship and
affection in her current relationship. Both see their bond as a permanent thing
and yet Gilbert is not enamoured enough by it to consider marriage. She has no
desire for kids, and as a woman living in a Western world, singlehood is no big
deal. So why marry at all, she asks.
The plan get upturned when Felipe's
constant travel to US evokes suspicion and he faces threat of being deported.
They must either marry and stay in US or then be singles, but face other
relationship challenges. They decide to get married but Gilbert is filled with
doubts.
While reading this book, I kept
getting the feeling that Gilbert is just not that into her boyfriend. I may be wrong here, but many times in the
course of the book I felt Gilbert was trying to justify her soon-to-happen
marriage, in the hope of seeing her
relationship as viable. She gives many reasons for her anxiousness, and even
admits that she is not madly in love with Felipe and thank god for that, she
says. She is balanced and alert this time, which is perhaps why she fine combs
every aspect of the relationship. But at the end of it, I wasn't sure if that
sort of moderate approach also works with everyone. Gilbert is right that infatuation does not
last. Certainly the hormonal rush and exhilaration brought are bound to
subside, and one ought to be realistic about it. Familiarity, at its worst,
breeds contempt, and at its best cultivates affection. But when one enters a union like marriage, conviction
is a must.
Falling in love does not always imply
recklessness. Yes, one tends to overlook a few things perhaps, but one still
looks out for many enduring qualities (Pride and Prejudice?). This then
translates into attraction and when couples instinctively feel it's the right
relationship for them, they take the plunge quite happily. The important thing is belief that it will
work. Of course nothing can be said about the future, but to my mind there is
nothing riskier than treating marriage like a 'sentence' which is the word
Gilbert uses for her relationship. She is filled with doubts and most will
agree that it happens when you are simply not sure if he's your man. It's not
the marriage at all.
Anyway, so thus she begins her
research project on marriage, its history, its cultural meaning and
significance that differ from community to community. She also looks at
marriage of the past and present, comparing her perspective with that of her
mother. She looks at the roots of marriage, and is surprised that an
institution which is considered sacrosanct today, was something which custodians
of religion were opposed to. They wanted people to reject it and adopt celibacy.
That never happened of course, and no matter what stand the State or religious
body took, men and women always have felt a natural inclination to come
together and marry. Which establishes that men and women have always held the
desire to get married.Gilbert using research findings and expert opinions brings forth some perceptive ideas. In most cultures, she says, women rarely questioned marriage. They accepted their fate and role. But with industrialization and the breaking up of the joint family system, the 'individual' suddenly came into focus and his/her private desires took precedence. Now, couples didn't necessarily marry because the spouse was 'beneficial' to the family as a whole or a convenient arrangement to all, but because they fell in love. Gilbert rightly points out that when a marriage is based on love and not on a collective arrangement, it has more chances to fail - precisely because love, she says, is a very fragile emotion. What if you fall out of love? Which is why modern couples are divorcing more than ever before, and she says the institution itself is under tremendous pressure.
Yet, Gilbert says she wouldn't trade
her life as a modern, educated, self-aware American woman of today with any
woman in a previous time and culture who had a conditioned idea of marriage.
Nor does she believe that people must not marry for love. But she points out
that one must be equipped with sufficient tools to deal with practical and
emotional problems before they get into it.
That is precisely what Gilbert
decides to do this time with her beau. She says she is thankfully not
infatuated this time. She loves the narcotic high of love, but is happy not to
go through it again. She is on as more emotionally secure and saner ground this
time, and both, she and Felipe discuss in some detail about dodging the
potential landmines in their future marital relationship.
I really liked a chapter where
Gilbert talks about the possibility of one's perfectly nice spouse falling for
someone else. "History teaches us
that just about anybody is capable of just about anything when it comes to the
realm of love and desire. Circumstances arises in all our lives that challenge
our most stubborn loyalties. Maybe this is what we fear most when we enter into
marriage. - that "circumstances," in the form of some uncontrollable
outside passion, will someday break the bond."
One might think that this is an
unavoidable situation, but Gilbert finds that it is not so! Regretting that she
did not have this wisdom when she got married at 25, she notes how couples can
drastically reduce such a risk of infatuation by containing the situation early
on. One makes friends with a member of
the opposite sex, and it is all harmless for a while. But somewhere an intimacy
creeps in and one reveals more than one ought to and this is by default becomes
a breach of marital trust. Soon, this gets emotionally complicated. Gilbert feels that with some
clear-sightedness and responsible behaviour, this risk can be drastically
minimised.
She takes you through the bumps and
jerks in her own relationship with Felipe, describing moments that infuriate
and frustrate her. Yet, she offers a reason for sticking it out in a
relationship. "He was a good man, in the end."
There might be a few readers (read
men) who will chuck this book in irritation, unable to understand Gilbert's
complex, over-analysing mind.
But most women will like the book and
will appreciate the candour and honesty . The writing is fluid and extremely
readable. Gilbert is witty, entertaining and wields a formidable pen. And yes
it is time well-spent.
5 comments:
:-) loved the book myself !
Hey Janaki, I didn't read the book in sequence, rather leafed through it randomly, but each time I found something in it to hold my attention. Thanks for sharing
Not sure if one can read a book like this but thoroughly enjoyed this review. As for the book - it seems a very naive attempt to look at the institution of marriage - though there are some very relevant observations. Yes - i think the concept of arranged marriage has a far better statistical chance of surviving a love marriage. But then its like saying dont buy stocks - stick to mutual funds.
The author (a lady i presume) seems a bit of a chauvinist based on silly and presumptuous statements like 'An intelligent woman, she says, will always be skeptical about the institution and worry about what it has for her'. I would think it would be far more accurate to say something like - Intelligent women will always be realistic about the institution of marriage and go in with an open mind. Overall this book seems to be written by someone who views marriage as a glass half empty. I would like to think marriages are always a glass half full :-)
K
>>I think such questioning is healthy, because it's a life-altering decision, which has a high-risk of failure in today's times.
Seems like a personal bias Ms Sandhya :-). I wouldnt know yet but I somehow am a little more of an optimist.
Questioning without any basis is pessimism.
>>However, individuals in it more often than not find it suffocating and an endless routine of tedious responsibility.
Any proof of this or is just blind guesswork.
As they say reward is proportional to risk. Yes marriage like any other decision in life has some risks - but hey cmon - whats life without a little excitement.
K
It sounds like a controversial topic, I need to check it out, Thank you.
Post a Comment